Cassation practice before the Areios Pagos is a fundamentally different discipline from litigating at first instance, and even from an ordinary appeal before the Efeteio. A trial court hears witnesses and weighs evidence. The Efeteio, on an ordinary appeal, can revisit the facts as well as the law. The Areios Pagos does neither — it does not re-examine what happened, does not reassess the evidence, and does not retry the case. Its role is narrower and more exacting: to review whether the law was correctly applied and whether the lower court's legal reasoning was sound. A cassation appeal succeeds or fails on how precisely its grounds are framed, not on how sympathetic the underlying facts are. On cassation an appeal and cassation lawyer in Greece argues errors of law only, which is a different exercise from re-running the trial.
Cassation before the Areios Pagos requires rights of audience at that level, which is a separate senior admission rather than an automatic entitlement. The firm holds it, so an appeal can be carried through to the Supreme Court of Greece by the same lawyer who argued it below.
That distinction is why a former judge's perspective matters so directly in this practice. Founding partner Stefanos Pantazis is a registered lawyer at the Athens Bar Association and a former member of the Hellenic judiciary, where he handled a broad range of civil and commercial cases at first instance before returning to private practice and founding the firm in 2002. That judicial background gives him direct insight into how appellate judges actually read a case file — not just what the law provides on its face, but how a court reasons its way from the provisions to a conclusion, and which formulations of a legal argument land and which do not. Appeal deadlines are short — send the judgment as soon as you have it.
"At the Areios Pagos, you are not retelling the story of what happened. You are showing, with precision, where the law was misapplied or the reasoning fell short. Understanding how a court actually thinks through that question is what a former judge brings to the table."
The Greek court system is layered for a reason, and not every dispute belongs at every level. A matter typically begins at first instance, may proceed to the Efeteio on an ordinary appeal where the facts can still be revisited, and — where the case turns on a genuine question of law or a defect in legal reasoning — may go forward to the Areios Pagos on cassation. We advise clients honestly on which stage actually serves their objectives, drawing on Stefanos's experience across all levels of the Greek court system, from first instance through cassation, rather than pursuing an appeal simply because one is technically available.
Scope of Review
Cassation reviews law, not facts
The Areios Pagos does not reassess evidence or retry a case — it reviews whether the law was correctly applied and the legal reasoning was sound.
Precision
Grounds for cassation must be framed precisely
A cassation appeal succeeds or fails on how precisely its legal grounds are drafted, not on how compelling the underlying facts are.
Judicial Insight
A former judge understands judicial reasoning from the inside
Stefanos Pantazis's judicial background gives him direct insight into how appellate courts actually reason through a case.
Strategy
Not every case belongs at the Areios Pagos
We advise honestly on whether first instance, the Efeteio or cassation is the right venue for your objectives.